Angular Standalone Components vs. Modules
Angular modules have been a fundamental part of the framework since its inception. They serve as a means to organize code, encapsulate dependencies, and configure Angular services. However, for smaller to medium-sized applications, modules can introduce complexity and boilerplate code.
Standalone components made their debut in Angular 13 with the aim of simplifying Angular development and reducing boilerplate. Unlike traditional Angular modules, standalone components don't require NgModule files and can be directly imported and used in any part of an application.
Advantages of Standalone Components
Reduced Boilerplate: Standalone components eliminate the need for creating and managing NgModule files, offering significant time and effort savings, particularly for smaller applications.
Enhanced Readability: Standalone components are self-contained and do not rely on external dependencies, making them easier to comprehend and maintain.
Effective Tree-Shaking: Standalone components can be more efficiently tree-shaken, resulting in reduced bundle sizes for production applications.
When to Opt for Standalone Components
Standalone components are an excellent choice for most new Angular applications. They are particularly well-suited for small and medium-sized projects and applications that follow the Single Component Angular Module (SCAM) pattern.
When to Stick with Modules
Modules remain indispensable in certain scenarios, such as:
- Bootstrapping an Angular application.
- Implementing lazy loading for components and routes.
- Dynamically instantiating components during runtime.
Standalone components offer several advantages over traditional modules, including reduced boilerplate, improved code readability, and better tree-shaking capabilities. However, modules are still essential for specific use cases.
So, which should you choose?
For new Angular applications, it's recommended to default to standalone components. Modules can be incorporated when needed, but they should generally be avoided for most components.
If you're maintaining an existing Angular application that relies on modules, there's no urgency to migrate to standalone components. However, consider using standalone components for any new components you create to leverage their benefits.
Related postsAngular Signals & Forms Angular 16 Injecting Service without Constructor Angular @Input View Transitions API in angular 17 tutorial View Transitions API in angular 17 tutorial Dynamically loading Angular components Angular 17 AfterRender & afterNextRender Angular Standalone Component Routing Angular Standalone Components vs. Modules Angular 17 resolvers Angular 17 Error Handling: What's New and How to Implement It Angular Signals in templates Angular Signals and HttpClient Angular Signals CRUD step by step Angular Injection Context: What is it and how to use it Angular Injection Context: What is it and how to use it How to Avoid Duplicate HTTP Requests Angular 17 — Deferred Loading Using Defer Block Asynchronous pipes in Angular: A Deeper dive Top 5 Angular Carousel Components of 2023 Angular 17 Material Multi Select Dropdown with Search Angular 17: Enhanced Control Flow Simplified with Examples Angular 17 Material Autocomplete Multiselect Step-by-Step Angular 17 Material Autocomplete Get Selected Value Example Angular 17 Material Alert Message Step by Step A Step-by-Step Guide to Using RxJS combineLatestWith RxJS Buffer: An Effective Tool for Data Grouping and Filtering Angular 14+ standalone components Angular v17 tutorial Angular 17 CRUD Tutorial: Consume a CRUD REST API Upgrade to Angular 17 Angular 17 standalone component Add Bootstrap 5 to Angular 17 with example & tutorial Angular 17 due date and new features Angular 17 Signals Explained
Hands-on Angular eBook
Subscribe to our Angular newsletter and get our hands-on Angular book for free!